Legal Opinion

Booth v. Auto-Owners Insurance

Michigan Court of Appeals

Decided October 28, 1997No. Docket 192527PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Per curiam

In this insurance dispute, plaintiff appeals as of right the trial court’s decision granting summary disposition in favor of defendant. We reverse.

Defendant is plaintiff’s no-fault insurance carrier. In 1989, plaintiff was involved in a serious automobile accident while making a delivery for her employer. As a result, she suffered a severe closed head injury and was in a coma for several months. After her discharge from the hospital in 1989, plaintiff went to live with her parents, Dawn and Thomas Booth. Since that date, Dawn allegedly has provided attendant care for her daughter twenty-four…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Perez v. State Farm Mutual Automobile InsuranceMichigan Supreme Court · 1984
  2. Van Marter v. American Fidelity Fire InsuranceMichigan Court of Appeals · 1982
  3. Reed v. Citizens Insurance Co. of AmericaMichigan Court of Appeals · 1993
  4. Tousignant v. Allstate InsuranceMichigan Supreme Court · 1993
  5. Moghis v. Citizens Insurance Co. of AmericaMichigan Court of Appeals · 1991

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Armisted v. State Farm Mutual Automobile InsuranceCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2012
  2. Sprague v. Farmers Insurance ExchangeMichigan Court of Appeals · 2002
  3. Hamilton v. AAA MICHIGANMichigan Court of Appeals · 2002
  4. Burris v. Allstate Insurance Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 2008
  5. Specht v. Citizens Insurance Co. of AmericaMichigan Court of Appeals · 1999

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API