Holmes v. State

Miller, Judge.

Acting pro se, Tyron Holmes appeals from the trial court’s order striking his answer to a complaint filed in a civil forfeiture case brought by the State. Among Holmes’s several enumerations are claims that the trial court should have held a hearing prior to the forfeiture of the property and the allegation that the court erred in denying the motion for summary judgment. We discern no error and affirm.

The State filed a complaint seeking forfeiture of several items of personal property seized as a result of a search warrant executed on property shared by Holmes and three other…