Legal Opinion

Crimley v. State of Georgia

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Decided February 18, 2015No. A14A1575PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

Boggs, Judge.

In this civil forfeiture case pursuant to OCGA § 16-13-49, the trial court granted the State of Georgia’s motion to strike the answers of Christopher S. Crimley (“Crimley”) and his wife and entered an order of disposition and distribution of the seized property. Crimley appeals, asserting that he had no fair opportunity to respond to the motion to strike, that service of the motion was inadequate, and that his answer was sufficient. We find his answer sufficient to withstand a motion to strike under the authority of Williams v. State of Ga., 222 Ga. App. 270 (474 SE2d 98) (1996).…

Also in this document: Concurrence.

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Williams v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1996
  2. Baker v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2004
  3. Harris v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1996
  4. Arreola-Soto v. State of GeorgiaCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2012
  5. Serchion v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1998

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Loveless v. State of GeorgiaCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2016

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API