Gangler v. Rice
Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit
1Per curiam
Without regard to their form, we treat the motion papers as an application for leave to proceed in this court in forma pauperis without paying the docket fee required by rule 18 and without printing records or briefs.
The decree below' confirmed the master’s report, and dismissed the bill, because the fraud alleged had not been established. An appeal was taken and citation issued, returnable not later than August 25, 1927.- No extension of the time for return to the appeal was made until March 20, 1928, when the District Court granted an extension, within which, and in May, 1928, the…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Jacobs v. GeorgeSupreme Court of the United States · 1893
- Pender v. BrownCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1903
- Shea v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1915
- Moran v. PeckCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1923
- Nazima Trading Co. v. MartinCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1908
3Cited by3 opinions
- Despiau v. United States Casualty Co.Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1937
- Gutierrez v. LongpreCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1936
- Bonet v. South Porto Rico Sugar Co.Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1936