Legal Opinion
People v. Santiago
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Decided November 15, 2011PublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Under the facts of this case, the Supreme Court providently exercised its discretion in denying the defendant’s request for an adjournment of the Sex Offender Registration Act hearing (see People v Sherard, 73 AD3d 537 [2010]; People v Wright, 53 AD3d 963, 964 [2008]; People v Ellis, 52 AD3d 1272, 1273 [2008]; People v Di John, 48 AD3d 1302, 1303 [2008]).
The defendant’s remaining contentions are without merit. Rivera, J.P, Angiolillo, Belen and Roman, JJ., concur.
2Cases cited4 opinions
- People v. SherardAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2010
- People v. WrightAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2008
- People v. Di JohnAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2008
- People v. EllisAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2008
3Cited by2 opinions
- People v. WorrellAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2014
- People v. WorrellAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2014