Matthew Lee Barnett v. State
Court of Appeals of Texas
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
BILL MEIER, JUSTICE
I. Introduction
Appellant Matthew Lee Barnett appeals his convictions for possession of less than one gram of methamphetamine and delivery of between four and 200 grams of methamphetamine. In one point, Barnett argues that the trial court abused its discretion by denying his motion to suppress evidence discovered after police stopped him, arrested him, and searched his vehicle and person. We will affirm.
II. Background
The State’s charges against Barnett stem from a series of events in which undercover police officers conducted a narcotics purchase from two of Barnett’s…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Amador v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 2007
- Johnson v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 2002
- Estrada v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 2005
- Woods v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1997
- Derichsweiler v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 2011
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.