Blankenburg v. Humble Oil & Refining Co.
Court of Appeals of Texas
1Opinion of the Court
PRICE, Chief Justice.
Humble Oil & Refining -Company, hereinafter referred to as “Humble”, and E. R. Wyatt, hereinafter referred to as “Wyatt”, as coplaintiffs sued Otis Blankenburg, Cleo F. Blankenburg, J. S. Atkins, Virgil Milli-gan, David Kane and the City of Charlotte, Texas, as defendants. Plaintiffs asserted that they were the owners in fee simple subject only to an easement in the *182public for street, alley or park purposes of the following described tract of land, to-wit: “All parks, plazas, streets and alleys in the City of Charlotte, Atascosa County, Texas, according to the map or plat…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- State v. Reagan County Purchasing Co.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1944
- Baumgarten v. FrostTexas Supreme Court · 1945
- Ross Amigos Oil Co. v. StateTexas Supreme Court · 1940
- Culver v. MiearsCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1949
- O'Neal v. City of ShermanTexas Supreme Court · 1890
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Humble Oil & Refining Co. v. BlankenburgTexas Supreme Court · 1951