Legal Opinion

Blankenburg v. Humble Oil & Refining Co.

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided April 19, 1950No. 4730PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

PRICE, Chief Justice.

Humble Oil & Refining -Company, hereinafter referred to as “Humble”, and E. R. Wyatt, hereinafter referred to as “Wyatt”, as coplaintiffs sued Otis Blankenburg, Cleo F. Blankenburg, J. S. Atkins, Virgil Milli-gan, David Kane and the City of Charlotte, Texas, as defendants. Plaintiffs asserted that they were the owners in fee simple subject only to an easement in the *182public for street, alley or park purposes of the following described tract of land, to-wit: “All parks, plazas, streets and alleys in the City of Charlotte, Atascosa County, Texas, according to the map or plat…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. State v. Reagan County Purchasing Co.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1944
  2. Baumgarten v. FrostTexas Supreme Court · 1945
  3. Ross Amigos Oil Co. v. StateTexas Supreme Court · 1940
  4. Culver v. MiearsCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1949
  5. O'Neal v. City of ShermanTexas Supreme Court · 1890

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Humble Oil & Refining Co. v. BlankenburgTexas Supreme Court · 1951

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API