People v. Mendro
Supreme Court of Colorado
1Opinion of the Court
VOLLACK, Justice.
The People appeal the trial court’s acquittal of the defendant on felony theft, pursuant to section 18-4-401, 8B C.R.S. (1986). The trial court, sitting as the trier of fact, found the People sustained their burden of proof beyond a reasonable doubt to all the elements of theft. However, the court ruled that a prosecution under the theft statute for violation of the mechanic’s lien statute, section 38-22-127, 16A C.R.S. (1982), required proof of an additional element of mens rea. The trial court ruled that the prosecution must prove that the defendant knew the requirements of…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Morissette v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1952
- People v. WashburnSupreme Court of Colorado · 1979
- People v. QuickSupreme Court of Colorado · 1986
- Kirkendoll v. PeopleSupreme Court of Colorado · 1958
- People v. PiskulaSupreme Court of Colorado · 1979
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- Lucio-Rayos v. SessionsCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2017
- MacArthur Co. v. Cupit (In re Cupit)United States Bankruptcy Court, D. Colorado · 2014
- People v. AndersonSupreme Court of Colorado · 1989
- Pritchard Concrete, Inc. v. Barnes (In Re Barnes)United States Bankruptcy Court, D. Colorado · 2007
- People v. WitekColorado Court of Appeals · 2004
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.