Home Indemnity Co. of New York v. City of Mobile
Supreme Court of Alabama
1Opinion of the Court
TORBERT, Chief Justice.
This appeal is a continuation of the litigation which we first considered in Home Indemnity Co. v. Anders, 459 So.2d 836 (Ala.1984) (hereinafter Home I), between the City of Mobile (City), Home Indemnity Company (Home), and numerous property owners in the City of Mobile. The sole question before us is whether the trial court properly granted summary judgment for the City on its claim that the insurance coverage provided by Home, to the City, is coextensive with the City’s liability under Code 1975, § 11-93-2.1
Home’s first contention is that the trial court was precluded…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Ryan v. Charles Townsend Ford, Inc.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1981
- Papastefan v. B & L Const. Co., Inc. of MobileSupreme Court of Alabama · 1978
- Home Indem. Co. v. AndersSupreme Court of Alabama · 1984
- Highlands Underwriters Ins. Co. v. Elegante Inns, Inc.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1978
- Fisher v. Space of Pensacola, Inc.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1984
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Folz v. StateNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1990
- Powell v. Blue Cross and Blue ShieldSupreme Court of Alabama · 1990
- Folz v. StateNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1990
- Warrick v. Graffiti, Inc.Court of Appeals of Minnesota · 1996