Legal Opinion

Warrick v. Graffiti, Inc.

Court of Appeals of Minnesota

Decided June 25, 1996No. C3-96-220Published

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

PARKER, Judge.

The district court concluded that because respondent Park Glen National Insurance Company (Park Glen) had complied with Minnesota case law regarding notification requirements, the new language in its renewal policy issued to Graffiti, Inc., d/b/a Howie’s Sports Bar (Howie’s), was effective and applied to appellants’ claims for damages. The district court also granted appellants’ request for prejudgment interest under the new policy language. Appellants challenge the district court’s decision, arguing that an insurer may not unilaterally change the terms of an effective…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Canadian Universal Insurance Co. v. Fire Watch, Inc.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1977
  2. Wilson v. HayesSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1889
  3. Olson v. PenkertSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1958
  4. Holt v. SwensonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1958
  5. Adams v. GreenwoodCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1993

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API