Legal Opinion
Spruce Environmental Technologies, Inc. v. Festa Radon Technologies, Co.
District Court, D. Massachusetts
Decided April 3, 2017No. Civil Action No. 15-11521-NMGPublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM & ORDER
Nathaniel M. Gorton, United States District Judge
This case involves a dispute between two competitors in the radon extraction business. Plaintiff/counterclaim-defendant Spruce Environmental Technologies, Inc. (“Spruce”) claims that defendant/counterclaim-plaintiff Festa Radon Technologies, Co. (“Festa”) engaged in false advertising of its fans in violation of 1) the Lanham Act, 15 U.S.C. § 1125(a), 2) the Massachusetts Consumer Protection Act, M.G.L. ch. 93A, §§ 2, 11, (“Chapter 93A”), 3) a Massachusetts statute that prohibits unfair and misleading advertisements, M.G.L. c.…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Samuel Mesnick v. General Electric CompanyCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1991
- Patrick J. O'COnnOr v. Robert W. SteevesCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1993
- Dávila v. Corporación De Puerto Rico Para La Difusión PúblicaCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2007
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Pegasystems Inc. v. Appian CorporationDistrict Court, D. Massachusetts · 2022
- Pegasystems Inc. v. Appian CorporationDistrict Court, D. Massachusetts · 2019