Heinzel v. Backstrom
Court of Appeals of Oregon
1Opinion of the Court
*173JOSEPH, C. J.
Plaintiffs seek specific performance of an agreement for the sale of a commercial building and two lots in Newberg owned by defendant Backstrom. The trial court found that there had been a valid contract of sale originally but that Backstrom was entitled to sell the property to defendants Johnson1 after plaintiffs did not deposit the purchase price in escrow by the agreed closing date. Plaintiffs assert that the court erred in holding that the agreement expired on that date. On de novo review, we reverse.
In August, 1986, plaintiffs expressed an interest in purchasing the…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Wood v. . Duff-GordonNew York Court of Appeals · 1917
- Usinger v. CampbellOregon Supreme Court · 1977
- Percy v. MILLEROregon Supreme Court · 1952
- McCREIGHT ET UX v. GirardoOregon Supreme Court · 1955
- Cottrell Et Ux. v. Prier Et Ux.Oregon Supreme Court · 1949
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Heinzel v. BackstromOregon Supreme Court · 1990
- Ochoa v. CrossenCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1991
- Heinzel v. BackstromCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1989
- McPherson v. DauenhauerCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2003