Legal Opinion

DiGesu v. Weingardt

New Mexico Supreme Court

Decided March 14, 1978No. 11578PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

EASLEY, Justice.

Mario DiGesu and Catherine DiGesu, plaintiffs-appellees, (DiGesu) brought a declaratory judgment action against Wilfred Weingardt, defendant-appellant, (Weingardt) to void a partial lease of a liquor license. The trial court granted summary judgment for DiGesu. Weingardt appeals. We affirm.

Issue

The issue is whether the parties, in splitting the liquor license and operating separate establishments on adjoining premises under a lease agreement, were in violation of the state regulation requiring that a license be leased in its “entirety,” thus making the lease void as…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Prudential Insurance Company of America v. AnayaNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1967
  2. Davies v. BoydNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1963
  3. Kimberly, Inc. v. HaysNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1975
  4. Davis v. SavageNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1946
  5. Fuller v. CrockerNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1940

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. State Ex Rel. Udall v. Colonial Penn InsuranceNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1991
  2. City of Artesia v. CarterNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 1980
  3. Baker v. ArmstrongNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1987
  4. Lynch v. Santa Fe National BankNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 1981
  5. K.R. Swerdfeger Construction, Inc. v. Board of RegentsNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 2006

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API