Legal Opinion

United States v. Gary Lee Hilliker

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided March 8, 1971No. 25662_1PublishedCited by 39 opinions

1Per curiam

Gary Lee Hilliker appeals from a conviction after a jury trial for violation of the Dyer Act, 18 U.S.C. § 2312. The' sole issue on this appeal is whether, measured by the standards of Miranda v. Arizona, 384 U.S. 436, 86 S.Ct. 1602, 16 L.Ed.2d 694 (1966), the trial court erred in admitting in evidence statements made by Hilliker to law enforcement officials on the day of the arrest.

The parties are in substantial agreement as to the facts. An Arizona state highway patrolman, Gary J. Zimmerman, arrested Hilliker after receiving a radio report that the automobile in which Hilliker and several…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Miranda v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
  2. Willie Samuel Rivers v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1968
  3. Carl D. Pettyjohn v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1969
  4. Louis West v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1968
  5. Gloria Jean Narro v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1966

3Cited by39 opinions

  1. North Carolina v. ButlerSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
  2. State v. MurphyOhio Supreme Court · 2001
  3. United States v. Hugh MacLeod Pheaster, United States of America v. Angelo IncisoCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1976
  4. State v. MurphyOhio Supreme Court · 2001
  5. United States v. Darrell Gene GlasgowCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1971

34 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API