Legal Opinion

Barksdale v. United States

District Court, W.D. South Carolina

Decided July 2, 1931No. 1071PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

WATKINS, District Judge.

By stipulation of counsel this ease was submitted to me without a jury. There is practically no dispute as to the facts. The matter first came before me at Greenville during the April term of the court. At that time egrtain stipulated facts were admitted in the record and a limited amount of oral testimony was taken. Thereafter counsel for the government and for the plaintiff submitted written briefs. It is due to counsel to state that these briefs were unusually well prepared, stating the contentions of the parties with unusual force and clearness. Before the matter…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. King v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1927

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. E.D.M. v. T.A.M.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1992
  2. United States v. BollmanCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1934
  3. Edm v. TamSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1992

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API