Legal Opinion
State v. Brooks
Oregon Supreme Court
Decided June 4, 1976No. C74-05-1335 Cr; C 74-03-0930 Cr; C 74-08-2469 Cr; C 74-11-3620 Cr; C 74-06-1918 Cr; C 74-05-1580 Cr; C 74-07-2277 Cr; C 74-07-2278 Cr; C 74-06-1981 Cr; C 74-04-1054 Cr; C 74-06-1983 Cr; C 74-08-2470 CrPublishedCited by 18 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
*175McAllister, j.
The seven defendants were each convicted of public indecency in violation of ORS 163.465. The convictions were affirmed by the Court of Appeals. 22 Or App 30. We granted review.
ORS 163.465 reads in pertinent part as follows:
"(1) A person commits the crime of public indecency if while in, or in view of, a public place he performs:
‡ ‡ ‡ ‡ ‡
"(c) An act of exposing his genitals with the intent of arousing the sexual desire of himself or another person.”
It was stipulated at trial that each of the defendants did knowingly expose her genitals with the intent of arousing the sexual…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- People v. ConradBuffalo City Court · 1972
- State v. BrooksCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1975
3Cited by18 opinions
- State v. CiancanelliOregon Supreme Court · 2005
- State v. BaysingerIndiana Supreme Court · 1979
- State v. WaltersSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1983
- City of Portland v. GatewoodCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1985
- Graham v. Kold Kist Beverage Ice, Inc.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 1979
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.