Legal Opinion

Kahn v. Dufrene

Louisiana Court of Appeal

Decided July 30, 1991No. 91-CA-61PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

BOWES, Judge.

Plaintiffs, Cheryl Ann and Daniel Kahn appeal a portion of a verdict and subsequent judgment which found that the insured, BESCO Exporting Corporation (employer of Daniel Kahn, hereinafter BESCO) intended to choose uninsured motorist coverage of less than the limits of bodily injury liability, and that the waiver form was clear and unambiguous. Intervenor-appellant, United States Fidelity and Guaranty Company (hereinafter USF & G), in its capacity as the worker’s compensation insurer of BESCO, also appealed that portion of the judgment which dismissed its claims as intervenor,…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Roger v. Estate of MoultonSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1987
  2. Borden, Inc. v. Howard Trucking Co., Inc.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 1984
  3. Wilson v. Cost+ Plus of Vivian, Inc.Louisiana Court of Appeal · 1979
  4. Aycock v. Allied Enterprises, Inc.Louisiana Court of Appeal · 1987
  5. Boudreaux v. VerretLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1982

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Efferson v. Kaiser Aluminum & Chemical Corp.District Court, E.D. Louisiana · 1993
  2. Kahn v. DufreneSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1992

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API