Legal Opinion

United States v. Weingold

District Court, D. New Jersey

Decided March 4, 1994No. Civ. A. 94-127 (WGB)PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

BASSLER, District Judge:

I. INTRODUCTION

The United States of America and the United States Postal Service have applied to this Court for a preliminary injunction under 39 U.S.C. § 3007, 18 U.S.C. § 1345 and Fed. R.Civ.P. 65. The Court has received papers submitted in support of the application by Robert M. Hanna, A.U.S.A., and papers submitted in opposition by Michael L. Levine, Esq., counsel for the defendants, Harold P. Weingold, Helen Archer, Inc., Future Forecasters Corp., Holy Trinity Society, Inc., Winners’ Network, Inc., Fight Back International, Inc., Paul Zax Enterprises and…

2Cases cited22 opinions

  1. McNally v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
  2. Porter v. Warner Holding Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1946
  3. Mitchell v. Robert DeMario Jewelry, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1960
  4. United States v. 4492 South Livonia RoadCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1989
  5. Donaldson v. Read Magazine, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1948

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. United States v. Ritchie Special Credit Investments, Ltd.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2010
  2. United States v. BarnesDistrict Court, N.D. Iowa · 1996
  3. United States v. FangDistrict Court, D. Maryland · 1996
  4. United States v. SriramDistrict Court, N.D. Illinois · 2001
  5. United States v. Narco Freedom, Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 2015

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API