Hornish v. King County
District Court, W.D. Washington
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER ON CROSS-MOTIONS FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT
Marsha J. Pechman, United States District Judge
The above-entitled Court, having received and reviewed:
1. Defendant King County’s Motion for Summary Judgment (Dkt. No. 46), Plaintiffs’ Response (Dkt. No. 54), and Defendant’s Reply (Dkt. No. 56);
2. Plaintiffs’ Motion for Summary Judgment (Dkt. No. 55), Defendant’s Response (Dkt. No. 61), and Plaintiffs’ Reply (Dkt. No. 62);
all attached exhibits and declarations, and relevant portions of the record, and having heard oral argument, rules as follows:
IT IS ORDERED that Plaintiffs’ motion for summary…
2Cases cited21 opinions
- Preseault v. Interstate Commerce CommissionSupreme Court of the United States · 1990
- Preseault v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1996
- Lawson v. StateWashington Supreme Court · 1986
- Brown v. StateWashington Supreme Court · 1996
- Roeder Co. v. Burlington Northern, Inc.Washington Supreme Court · 1986
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Lucier v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2018
- Tracy & Barbara Neighbors v. King Co.Court of Appeals of Washington · 2020
- United States of America for use and benefit of Mountain Utilities, Inc. v. Fidelity and Deposit Company of MarylandDistrict Court, D. Idaho · 2022