State v. Arnett
Ohio Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtWright, J.
The sole issue raised in this appeal is whether the state may seek leave to appeal an order under R.C. 2945.67 after a jury has returned a verdict of acquittal. R.C. 2945.67(A) provides:
“A prosecuting attorney * * * may appeal by leave of the court to which the appeal is taken any other decision, except the final verdict, of the trial court in a criminal case * * *.” (Emphasis added.)
A comparable situation was presented to this court in State v. Keeton (1985), 18 Ohio St. 3d 379. In that case, the trial court entered judgments of acquittal and the state sought leave to appeal various…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- State v. KeetonOhio Supreme Court · 1985
- State v. WallaceOhio Supreme Court · 1975
3Cited by21 opinions
- State v. BistrickyOhio Supreme Court · 1990
- State v. EdmondsonOhio Supreme Court · 2001
- State v. RossOhio Supreme Court · 2010
- State v. PawelskiOhio Court of Appeals · 2008
- State v. RaderOhio Court of Appeals · 1988
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.