Legal Opinion

Disciplinary Proceedings Against Molinaro

Wisconsin Supreme Court

Decided July 1, 2009No. 2007AP869-DPublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Per curiam

¶ 1. Attorney Thomas J. Molinaro has appealed that portion of a referee's report concluding that the Office of Lawyer Regulation (OLR) met its burden of proof as to 8 of the 13 counts of misconduct alleged in the OLR's complaint. The issues raised in Attorney Molinaro's appeal are whether there is a sufficient basis to support the referee's findings of fact and conclusions of law as to the eight counts of misconduct; assuming that this court concludes that Attorney Molinaro did engage in misconduct, what is the appropriate sanction; and should Attorney Molinaro be required to pay the full…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. In the Matter of Disciplinary Proceedings Against WiduleWisconsin Supreme Court · 2003
  2. In the Matter of Disciplinary Proceedings Against EisenbergWisconsin Supreme Court · 2004
  3. In the Matter of Disciplinary Proceedings Against EdgarWisconsin Supreme Court · 1999
  4. In the Matter of Disciplinary Proceedings Against KrezminskiWisconsin Supreme Court · 2007
  5. Disciplinary Proceedings Against BoydWisconsin Supreme Court · 2006

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Office of Lawyer Regulation v. James T. RunyonWisconsin Supreme Court · 2015
  2. In the Matter of Disciplinary Proceedings Against FrischWisconsin Supreme Court · 2010
  3. In the Matter of Disciplinary Proceedings Against FrischWisconsin Supreme Court · 2010
  4. Office of Lawyer Regulation v. James T. RunyonWisconsin Supreme Court · 2015

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API