Legal Opinion
Hubbard v. Metropolitan Property & Casualty Insurance
Supreme Court of Vermont
Decided November 2, 2007No. 06-252PublishedCited by 11 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtBurgess, J.
¶ 1. Plaintiffs Richard and Dianne Hubbard, on behalf of themselves and the estate of their child, Seth, appeal the superior court’s summary judgment in favor of their auto insurance carrier, Metropolitan Property and Casualty Company. Seth died while a passenger in a car driven by another boy who lost control and crashed in a single-car accident. After the accident, plaintiffs claimed uninsured/underinsured motorist (UM/UIM) coverage for Seth under their Metropolitan insurance policies. Metropolitan denied plaintiffs’ claim in part, arguing that its obligation to pay UM/UIM benefits for…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Colwell v. Allstate InsuranceSupreme Court of Vermont · 2003
- Sanders v. St. Paul Mercury InsuranceSupreme Court of Vermont · 1987
- Searles v. Agency of TransportationSupreme Court of Vermont · 2000
- Monteith v. Jefferson Ins. Co. of New YorkSupreme Court of Vermont · 1992
- Bray v. North Carolina Farm Bureau Mutual InsuranceSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1995
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- Progressive Insurance v. Brown Ex Rel. BrownSupreme Court of Vermont · 2008
- Progressive Casuality Insurance Co. v. MMG Insurnace Co.Supreme Court of Vermont · 2014
- Hubbard v. METROPOLITAN PROPERTYSupreme Court of Vermont · 2007
- Humphrey v. Vermont Mutual Automobile InsuranceSupreme Court of Vermont · 2009
- Weiler v. HooshiariSupreme Court of Vermont · 2011
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.