Legal Opinion

Musso v. Cronley

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided December 14, 1967No. 4670PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

WILSON, Justice.

This action was framed as a boundary dispute. Appellee-plaintiff sought judgment for title to a three-foot strip between two city lots and an injunction requiring removal of alleged encroachments. In a non-jury trial title was decreed to be in appellee, and appellants were ordered to remove the encroachments. We affirm.

Although appellants pleaded the 25-year statute of limitation, they concede they failed to establish any right thereunder, and their sole point on the merits is that the undisputed evidence shows they acquired title by adverse possession under the…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Petroleum Anchor Equipment, Inc. v. TyraTexas Supreme Court · 1967
  2. Reid v. Associated Employers LloydsCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1942
  3. Maher v. GonzalezCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1964
  4. Denwitty v. WesleyCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1966
  5. Tex-Craft Builders, Inc. v. Housing Authority of Texas CityCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1966

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Land Title Co. of Dallas, Inc. v. F. M. Stigler, Inc.Texas Supreme Court · 1980
  2. Hunter v. CarterCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1972
  3. International Security Life Insurance Co. v. KuhlerCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1970
  4. Opinion No., Texas Attorney General Reports1978
  5. Spellman v. American Universal Investment Co., Texas Court of Appeals, 13th District1984

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API