People v. Davis
California Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
BROWN, J.
We granted review in this case to consider (1) whether for a prior juvenile adjudication to qualify as a “strike,” the juvenile court must have expressly found the juvenile “to be a fit and proper subject to be dealt with under the juvenile court law” (Pen. Code,1 § 667, subd. (d)(3)(C)), and (2) whether a prior juvenile adjudication for residential burglary qualifies as a “strike” (§ 667, subd. (d)(3)). We conclude that no express finding of fitness is required, and that under the circumstances of this case we need not reach the issue of whether a prior juvenile adjudication…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- People v. HazeltonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1996
3Cited by33 opinions
- People v. WilliamsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1998
- People v. GarciaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1999
- People v. DotsonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1997
- People v. AcostaCalifornia Supreme Court · 2002
- In re Edwards, California Court of Appeal, 5th District2018
28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.