Legal Opinion

Commonwealth v. Metzer

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided November 24, 1993No. 2138PublishedCited by 39 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

KELLY, Judge.

In this appeal we are called upon to determine whether the trial court erred in its sua sponte reconsideration of its decision to grant appellant’s motion in limine to exclude the results of a breathalyzer test after appellant’s counsel made his opening statement to the jury in reliance upon the initial ruling. We reverse judgment of sentence and remand for a new trial.

I. FACTS AND PROCEDURAL HISTORY

On October 6, 1991, at approximately 3:35 a.m., appellant struck the rear of an automobile stopped for a red light at the intersection of Oxford Valley Road and Trenton Road in Falls…

2Cases cited32 opinions

  1. Chapman v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
  2. Commonwealth v. BosurgiSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1963
  3. Commonwealth v. TerrySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1987
  4. Commonwealth v. SmithSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1989
  5. Commonwealth v. JarmanSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1992

27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by39 opinions

  1. Commonwealth v. FreemanSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2015
  2. State v. ShindlerOhio Supreme Court · 1994
  3. Commonwealth v. StokesSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2013
  4. Commonwealth v. JamesSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2013
  5. Commonwealth v. NollSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1995

34 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API