Legal Opinion

State Ex Rel. Chapman v. Edwards

Washington Supreme Court

Decided March 12, 1931No. 22808. Department OnePublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtMain, J.

By this action, the relator sought a writ of mandamus directing the board of trustees of the firemen’s relief and pension fund of the city of Seattle to retire him upon a pension. To the amended affidavit and application for the writ, the hoard demurred and answered. The demurrer was sustained, and, the re--lator refusing to plead further, judgment was entered dismissing the action, from which he appeals.

The facts are these: The appellant became a member of the fire department of the city of Seattle January 1, 1921. July 17, 1922, he was injured while in the performance of his duties as a…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Graves v. DunlapWashington Supreme Court · 1915
  2. Carleton v. Board of Police Pension Fund CommissionersWashington Supreme Court · 1921
  3. Pierce v. PierceWashington Supreme Court · 1919
  4. State ex rel. Criswell v. Board of Trustees of Firemen's Relief & Pension FundWashington Supreme Court · 1916

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Hammack v. Monroe Street Lumber Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1959
  2. Earle v. Froedtert Grain & Malting Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1938
  3. Bodine v. Department of Labor & IndustriesWashington Supreme Court · 1948
  4. In Re GiffordWashington Supreme Court · 1937
  5. Layton v. Home Indemnity Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1941

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API