Versailles Twp. v. Ulm Et Ux.
Superior Court of Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion by
Rhodes, J.,
A resolution or ordinance adopted hy the municipal authorities of plaintiff township authorized the construction of sanitary sewers in certain designated streets or highways, including Ohio Avenue, the street on which appellants’ property was located. The system was eventually constructed and made usable. A municipal claim was filed against appellants on March 9, 1940, and a writ of scire facias was issued thereon. Appellants filed an affidavit of defense, and the defense therein was that the sewer had been completed prior to September 9, 1939, and that there was a…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Newell v. People Ex Rel. PhelpsNew York Court of Appeals · 1852
- Wilkinsburg Boro. v. School DistrictSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1929
- Town of Checotah v. Town of EufaulaSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1911
3Cited by3 opinions
- Commonwealth v. Harmar Coal Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1973
- SOUTHERN GUARANTY INSURANCE COMPANY v. ScottSupreme Court of Alabama · 1972
- TEXAS EASTERN TRANSMISSION v. East Amwell Tp.New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1964