Legal Opinion

Black Bear v. Lingren

District Court, D. South Dakota

Decided March 27, 2024No. 5:23-cv-05049Unknown

1Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF SOUTH DAKOTA WESTERN DIVISION SONJI A. BLACK BEAR, 5:23-CV-05049-RAL Plaintiff, OPINION AND ORDER GRANTING VS. PLAINTIFF’S MOTION FOR LEAVE TO PROCEED IN FORMA PAUPERIS, HEIDI LINGREN!; STATE DEPARTMENT OF DENYING PLAINTIFF’S MOTION TO SOCIAL SERVICES; JENNIFER ODEGARD; APPOINT COUNSEL, DIRECTING SHAWNDAI STANDING CLOUD; MISTY SERVICE, AND 1915 SCREENING MCCLASTER; MIKE VON SAVOYE; ROXIE ERICKSON; ILISJA DUFFY; PAULA PEDERSON; and BETSEY HARRIS, Defendants. Plaintiff Sonji A. Black Bear filed a pro se lawsuit under

42 U.S.C. §§ 1983, 1985, and 1986 and…

2Cases cited59 opinions

  1. Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
  2. Monell v. New York City Dept. of Social Servs.Supreme Court of the United States · 1978
  3. Erickson v. PardusSupreme Court of the United States · 2007
  4. Will v. Michigan Department of State PoliceSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
  5. Stump v. SparkmanSupreme Court of the United States · 1978

54 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API