Legal Opinion

City of Cushing v. Gillespie

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided April 21, 1953No. 35325PublishedCited by 16 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtWilliams, J.

In 1924, the city of Cushing, hereinafter referred to as city, condemned certain lands involved in this action for the purpose of enlarging a water reservoir. The lands at that time belonged to George T. Gillespie and his wife. In 1931, George Gillespie executed an oil and gas lease covering the lands herein involved; he also sold mineral rights to various people. On May 15, 1951, the city issued a drilling permit covering the land herein involved; it was shown that neither at that time, nor at any other time prior to the filing of the instant action, did the city claim to own the mineral…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Harn v. State Ex Rel. WilliamsonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1939
  2. Jones v. Oklahoma CitySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1941

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. Elliott v. City of GuthrieSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1986
  2. State Ex Rel. Department of Highways v. BradfordSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1962
  3. Town of Morganton v. Hutton & Bourbonnais Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1960
  4. Captline v. County of AlleghenyCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1983
  5. Board of County Commissioners v. LowerySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 2006

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API