MPW Industrial Services v. Workers' Compensation Appeal Board
Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania
1Dissent
DISSENTING OPINION BY
Senior Judge KELLEY.
I respectfully dissent.
Section 2208 of the Administrative Code of 1929 (Administrative Code)1 provides, in pertinent part:
[T]he Department of Labor and Industry [ (Department) ] shall have the power, and its duty shall be:(a) To administer and, enforce the laws of this Commonwealth, as now ex*323isting or hereafter enacted, relating to workmen’s compensation ...;(b) To receive and classify reports of all accidents and injuries; to receive and examine or disapprove agreements, supplemental agreements, notices, receipts, final receipts, and other papers in…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Kuney v. PMA InsuranceSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1990
- American Casualty Co. v. KLIGERMANSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1950
- Rossa v. Workers' Compensation Appeal BoardSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2003
- Mohan v. Publicker Industries, Inc.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1964
- Lehigh Foundations, Inc. v. CommonwealthCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1978
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.