Legal Opinion · Dissent

MPW Industrial Services v. Workers' Compensation Appeal Board

Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania

Decided March 29, 2005Published

1Dissent

DISSENTING OPINION BY

Senior Judge KELLEY.

I respectfully dissent.

Section 2208 of the Administrative Code of 1929 (Administrative Code)1 provides, in pertinent part:

[T]he Department of Labor and Industry [ (Department) ] shall have the power, and its duty shall be:(a) To administer and, enforce the laws of this Commonwealth, as now ex*323isting or hereafter enacted, relating to workmen’s compensation ...;(b) To receive and classify reports of all accidents and injuries; to receive and examine or disapprove agreements, supplemental agreements, notices, receipts, final receipts, and other papers in…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Kuney v. PMA InsuranceSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1990
  2. American Casualty Co. v. KLIGERMANSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1950
  3. Rossa v. Workers' Compensation Appeal BoardSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2003
  4. Mohan v. Publicker Industries, Inc.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1964
  5. Lehigh Foundations, Inc. v. CommonwealthCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1978

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API