Legal Opinion

International & Great Northern Railroad v. Hood

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided April 17, 1909PublishedCited by 9 opinions

Appeal from the District Court of Navarro County. Tried below before Hon. L. B. Cobb.

1Opinion of the CourtRainey, Chief Justice

(on motion for rehearing by appellant).— TJpon a reconsideration of this case we have reached the conclusion that we erred in our former disposition of the case in holding that the statement of facts could not be considered as it was copied in the transcript and was not the original. When the statement of facts is copied in the record, instead of having the original sent up, unless objection is made the irregularity will be considered waived and the said statement -will be considered in deciding the case. Royal Ins. Co. v. Texas & G. Ry. Co., 102 Texas, 306.

There was a waiver in this case by…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Royal Insurance v. Texas & Gulf Railway Co.Texas Supreme Court · 1909

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Parrish v. ParrishCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1926
  2. Golden West Oil Co. No. 1 v. Golden Rod Oil Co. No. 1Court of Appeals of Texas · 1925
  3. Clifton Mercantile Co. v. ConwayCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1924
  4. Williams v. Texas & N. O. Ry. Co.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1937
  5. Dickey v. JacksonCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1927

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API