Legal Opinion

Haendle v. Stewart

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided July 1, 1903PublishedCited by 12 opinions

• Submission of a controversy upon an agreed statement of facts, pursuant to section 1279 of the Code of Civil Procedure.

1Opinion of the Court

Ingraham, J.:

The plaintiff on the 14th day of April, 1902, made a contract whereby she agreed to sell and convey to the defendant certain real estate in the city of New York. The contract provides that “ the deed shall be an executor’s deed, * * * to convey to the vendee, or the vendee’s assigns, the absolute fee of the above premises, free from all incumbrances except as herein stated.” The completion of the contract was adjourned until the 19th day of May, 1902, at which date the plaintiff tendered to the defendant a deed whereby the plaintiff 11 individually and as sole qualifying…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Woodward v. . JamesNew York Court of Appeals · 1889
  2. Losey v. . StanleyNew York Court of Appeals · 1895
  3. Rogers v. . RogersNew York Court of Appeals · 1888
  4. Rankine v. MetzgerAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1902

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Hodgman v. CobbAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1922
  2. Doscher v. WyckoffAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1909
  3. Smith v. FloydAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1908
  4. In re the Judicial Settlement of the Accounts of FarrellAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1909
  5. Forman v. YoungAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1915

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API