Legal Opinion

In Re Varney's Petition

District Court, S.D. California

Decided April 27, 1956No. 19257PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

141 F.Supp. 190 (1956)

Matter of the Petition in Behalf of Louis B. VARNEY, Petitioner, For a Writ of Habeas Corpus.

UNITED STATES of America ex rel. Tobias G. KLINGER,

v.

COMMANDANT, UNITED STATES DISCIPLINARY BARRACKS, Lompoc, California, Respondent.

No. 19257.

United States District Court S. D. California, Central Division.

April 27, 1956.

Tobias G. Klinger, Los Angeles, Cal., for petitioner.

Laughlin E. Waters, U. S. Atty., Max F. Deutz & Andrew J. Weisz, Asst. U. S. Attys., Los Angeles, Cal., James W. Booth, Lt. Col. United States Army Judge Advocate General's Corps., Washington, D. C., for…

2Cases cited59 opinions

  1. M'culloch v. State of MarylandSupreme Court of the United States · 1819
  2. Mooney v. HolohanSupreme Court of the United States · 1935
  3. In Re DebsSupreme Court of the United States · 1895
  4. The United States v. Hudson and GoodwinSupreme Court of the United States · 1812
  5. Burns v. WilsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1953

54 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. United States v. Milton GatlinCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2000
  2. United States ex rel. Guagliardo v. McElroyDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 1958
  3. United States Ex Rel. Wilson v. BohlanderDistrict Court, D. Colorado · 1958
  4. Bell v. ClarkDistrict Court, E.D. Virginia · 1970
  5. In Re YokoyamaDistrict Court, S.D. California · 1959

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API