Legal Opinion

Columbus Bar Assn. v. Troxell

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided July 6, 2011No. 2010-2248PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Per curiam

{¶ 1} Respondent, Richard Hollingsworth Harold Troxell of Hilliard, Ohio, Attorney Registration No. 0066395, was admitted to the practice of law in Ohio in 1996.

{¶ 2} On February 8, 2010, relator, Columbus Bar Association, filed a three-count complaint charging respondent with professional misconduct arising from his alleged neglect of client matters, failure to provide competent representation, failure to reasonably communicate with his clients or respond to their demands for information, failure to give notice of, account for, and deliver funds in which a client or third person has an…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Stark Cty. Bar Assn. v. ButtacavoliOhio Supreme Court · 2002
  2. Disciplinary Counsel v. MathewsonOhio Supreme Court · 2007
  3. Akron Bar Ass'n v. GoodletOhio Supreme Court · 2007
  4. Cleveland Metropolitan Bar Ass'n v. KaplanOhio Supreme Court · 2010

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Disciplinary Counsel v. JacksonOhio Supreme Court · 2016
  2. Lake County Bar Ass'n v. TroyOhio Supreme Court · 2011
  3. Disciplinary Counsel v. KramerOhio Supreme Court · 2016
  4. Disciplinary Counsel v. KramerOhio Supreme Court · 2016

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API