Legal Opinion
Bibeau v. Pacific Northwest Research Foundation, Inc.
District Court, D. Oregon
Decided July 28, 1997No. CIV. 95-06410-HOPublishedCited by 1 opinion
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER
HOGAN, District Judge.
Before the court are defendants’ motions for summary judgment (#s 143, 150, 154, 160). Defendants Pacific Northwest Research Foundation (PNRF), Mavis Rowley (Rowley), Battelle Pacific Northwest Laboratories (BPNL), and Dr. Daniel Diiaconi (Diiaconi) argue that summary judgment should be granted because plaintiffs’ claims are barred by the statute of limitations, and they are shielded from liability by qualified immunity. PNRF and Rowley also argue that their motion for summary judgment should be granted because their research was conducted in good faith. Defendant…
2Cases cited28 opinions
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- United States v. KubrickSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
- Order of Railroad Telegraphers v. Railway Express Agency, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1944
- United Steelworkers of America v. Phelps Dodge Corporation, a New York Corporation, DefendantsCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1989
- Gibson v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1986
23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Bibeau v. PACIFIC NORTHWEST RESEARCH FOUNDATION, INC.District Court, D. Oregon · 1997