Legal Opinion

Home Insurance v. Chang

New York Court of Appeals

Decided February 17, 1977PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the CourtJones, J.

We hold that appellant’s commercial transactions did not come within the coverage of the "Ocean Marine Cargo Open Policy” issued by respondent insurer, and accordingly that premiums are not payable with respect thereto.

Appellant Chang was engaged as a broker dealing in foodstuffs produced and canned in Taiwan and imported into the United States. Respondent, Home Insurance, was the insurer under a policy of ocean marine insurance which covered foodstuffs shipped on voyages "from ports and/or places elsewhere in the world (excluding Russia and Russian dominated territories) to ports and/or…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Chase Manhattan Bank v. Nissho Pacific Corp.New York Court of Appeals · 1965
  2. Chase Manhattan Bank v. Nissho Pacific Corp.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1964
  3. Disch v. National Surety Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1922

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Quiñones v. CastellóSupreme Court of Puerto Rico · 1910

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API