Legal Opinion
In re PHILIP EMIABATA
District Court, D. Oregon
Decided July 7, 2026No. 3:26-cv-00962Unknown
1Opinion
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF OREGON In re PHILIP EMIABATA, Case No.: 3:26-cv-00962-AN Appellant. OPINION AND ORDER This bankruptcy appeal arises out of Case No. 26-31444-dwh13 in the U.S. Bankruptcy Court for the District of Oregon. Appellant Philip Emiabata now seeks a temporary restraining order (“TRO”) permitting reentry into his Texas home.1 The Court finds that oral argument will not help resolve this matter. See Local R. 7-1(d). For the reasons stated below, appellant’s motion is DENIED. LEGAL STANDARD TROs are subject to substantially the same factors as…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Winter v. Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 2008
- District of Columbia Court of Appeals v. FeldmanSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Alliance for Wild Rockies v. CottrellCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2011
- Granny Goose Foods, Inc. v. Brotherhood of Teamsters & Auto Truck Drivers, Local No. 70Supreme Court of the United States · 1974
- Stuhlbarg International Sales Company, Inc., a California Corporation, D/B/A Sisco v. John D. Brush and Company, Inc., a New York CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2001
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.