Legal Opinion

Crescent Insurance v. Camp

Texas Supreme Court

Decided October 19, 1888No. 2521PublishedCited by 21 opinions

Appeal from Cherokee. Tried below before the Hon. N. G. Kittrell. This is a second appeal. A statement of tne case appears in 64 Texas, 522.

1Opinion of the Court

Stayton, Chief Justice.

This cause was before this court at a former term, and is reported in 64 Texas, 521, where a statement of the case will be found.

The policy made the basis of this action contained a provision that if the interest of the assured in the property be any other than the entire, unconditional and sole ownership of the property for the use and benefit of the assured * * * it must be so expressed, in the written portion of the policy, otherwise the policy shall be void.”

A part of the stock of goods insured had belonged to a firm composed of N. Ellenstein and one Guensberg,…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Liverpool & London & Globe Insurance v. EndeTexas Supreme Court · 1885
  2. Crescent Ins. v. CampTexas Supreme Court · 1885

3Cited by21 opinions

  1. Davis v. Phoenix InsuranceCalifornia Supreme Court · 1896
  2. Southern Underwriters v. JonesCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1929
  3. Schumann v. Brownwood Mut. Life Ins.Texas Commission of Appeals · 1926
  4. Southern Mut. Fire Ins. v. Mazoch Bros.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1927
  5. German Insurance v. EverettCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1898

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API