Chicago, Burlington & Quincy Railroad v. Roberts

Oldham, C.

This cause of action is before the court for a second review on error. The first time it reached- this tribunal every issue involved in the controversy was ably and carefully reviewed in an unofficial opinion- by Pound, C., which may be found in 3 Neb. (Unof.) 425. At this hearing the cause was reversed and remanded because the evidence was not sufficient to support the judgment. On a new trial, directed by this court, substantially the same evi*540dence as that reviewed by the learned commissioner at the first hearing in this court was submitted, and plaintiff again had judgment, from…