Legal Opinion
Retired State Employees Ass'n v. State
Supreme Court of Louisiana
Decided June 28, 2013No. 2013-CA-0499PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
GUIDRY, Justice.
|] The district court declared that Act No. 483 of the 2012 Regular Session of the Louisiana Legislature was enacted in violation of the constitutional requirements found in Article X, Section 29(F) of the Louisiana Constitution. The defendants appealed directly to this court pursuant to Article V, Section 5(D) of the Constitution. We granted the defendants’ request for *570expedited consideration pursuant to La. Sup.Ct. Rule VI, § 4, docketed the case for briefing and oral argument, and have now completed our appellate review.1 For the reasons set forth below, we affirm the…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- Ferguson v. SkrupaSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
- Leake v. ParsonLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1925
- Bd. of Com'rs of Orleans Levee Dist. v. Dept. of Natural ResourcesSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1986
- City of New Orleans v. ASSESSORS'RETIREMENT AND RELIEF FUNDSupreme Court of Louisiana · 2008
- Louisiana Associated Gen. Contr. v. CalcasieuSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1991
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Ogea v. MerrittSupreme Court of Louisiana · 2013
- Jennifer Diane Nunez v. Pinnacle Homes, L.L.C. and Sua Insurance CompanySupreme Court of Louisiana · 2015
- Stonecipher v. Caddo ParishLouisiana Court of Appeal · 2017
- Jennifer Diane Nunez v. Pinnacle Homes, L.L.C. and Sua Insurance CompanySupreme Court of Louisiana · 2015
- Kevin Cope and Roger Laine v. Board of Supervisors of Louisiana State University and A&M CollegeLouisiana Court of Appeal · 2025
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.