Legal Opinion

Conrad v. Industrial Commission

Ohio Court of Appeals

Decided February 10, 1938No. 1462PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

By GEIGER, J.

This cause is .before this court upon appeal from an order and judgment of the Common Pleas Court of Montgomery County, sustaining a motion of the defendant for a directed verdict, on questions of law.

The matter had its inception in a petition filed by plaintiff against the .Industrial Commission, in which he alleges that on the 10th day of June, 1935, he was in the employ of the Rike-Kumler Company of Dayton, Ohio, as an electrician and maintenance man; that on said day, while at work for said Company, and while in the course of his employment, he sustained a severe…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Kern v. Contract Cartage Co.Ohio Court of Appeals · 1936
  2. Esmonde v. Lima Locomotive Works, Inc.Ohio Court of Appeals · 1935

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Herndon v. Morgan Mills, Inc.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1965

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API