Legal Opinion
Gresham v. Superior Court
California Court of Appeal
Decided May 6, 1941No. Civ. 12952PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtMcCOMB, J.
This is an original application for a writ of mandate to require respondents to set aside an order dismissing an action brought by petitioner as assignee of a judgment to have the same renewed. Respondent court has filed an answer. Respondent Judge Pierson M. Hall has filed a demurrer to the petition on the ground that it fails to state a cause of action as to him.
So far as material here, the essential facts are:
September 28, 1935, petitioner, a member of the State Bar of California, as attorney for plaintiff obtained a judgment in favor of plaintiff in an action entitled Daniel M. Kuter v.…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Alexander v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1928
- Goble v. Appellate Department of Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1933
3Cited by5 opinions
- Rapp v. Van DusenCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1965
- Pettie v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1960
- Sperry & Hutchinson Co. v. California State Board of PharmacyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1966
- Trujillo v. City of Los AngelesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1969
- Howard H. Rapp, Administrator of the Estate of Richard F. Zeller, Deceased v. Honorable Francis L. Van Dusen, Roberta Barrack, Administratrix, Leach Biernbaum and Dewey Hoffman, Extrs., Doris A. Laister, Extx. v. Honorable Francis L. Van Dusen Et Sl., Sidney W. Popkin v. Honorable Francis L. Van Dusen, United States District Judge for the Eastern District of PennsylvaniaCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1965