Legal Opinion

Holt Manufacturing Co. v. Thomas

Washington Supreme Court

Decided August 16, 1912No. 10194PublishedCited by 8 opinions

Appeal from an order of the superior court for Adams county, Pendergast, J., entered November 28, 1911, dissolving an attachment, after a hearing before the court upon affidavits.

1Opinion of the CourtParker, J.

The plaintiff commenced this action in the superior court seeking recovery from the defendants upon two promissory notes and an open account aggregating approximately $5,000. At the same time, the plaintiff sued *489out a writ of attachment against the property of defendants upon the ground that they had assigned, secreted, and disposed of their property with the intention to delay or defraud their creditors. The defendant moved the court to dissolve the attachment, alleging that it was wrongfully issued. The motion came on for hearing before the court upon evidence produced in the form of…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. National Surety Co. v. UddWashington Supreme Court · 1911
  2. O'Leary v. DuvallWashington Supreme Court · 1895
  3. Mikolojczak v. North American Chemical Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1901
  4. A. P. Hotaling Co. v. ClancyWashington Supreme Court · 1899
  5. Ellis v. MusselmanNebraska Supreme Court · 1901

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. In Re KornbluthCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1933
  2. Leavy v. Metropolitan Life InsuranceCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1978
  3. Crookston State Bank v. LeeSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1913
  4. Holt Manufacturing Co. v. BenningtonWashington Supreme Court · 1913
  5. Siegel v. KracowerWashington Supreme Court · 1927

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API