Legal Opinion

Williams v. Director of Patuxent Institution

Court of Appeals of Maryland

Decided July 15, 1963No. App. No. 4PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Per curiam

In this application for leave to appeal a finding by the Criminal Court of Baltimore that he was a defective delinquent within the meaning of Code (1957), Art. 31B, Sec. 5, the applicant, Lester E. Williams, alleges that: (1) the defective delinquent statute, Code (1957), Art. 31B, is “arbitrary and oppressive,” “an attempt to subvert the United States Constitution” and an ex post facto law, and therefore unconstitutional; (2) he was placed in double jeopardy by the finding of defective delinquency; and (3) he does not fit the description of a defective delinquent.

The first two contentions…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Eggleston v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1956
  2. Simmons v. Director of Patuxent InstitutionCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1962
  3. McDonough v. Director of Patuxent InstitutionCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1962

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Williams v. DirectorCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1963

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API