Legal Opinion

Porth v. Brodrick

Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit

Decided August 7, 1954No. 4811_1PublishedCited by 46 opinions

1Per curiam

A. J. Porth, herein referred to as taxpayer, instituted this action against the Collector of Internal Revenue for the State of Kansas to recover the sum of $135 which he alleged was erroneously and illegally paid on his declaration of estimated income tax for the year 1951. The trial court dismissed the petition upon the Collector’s motion on the ground that it failed to state a claim upon which relief could be granted. The taxpayer appealed.

The taxpayer filed his declaration of estimated income tax for 1951 and at the same time paid $135. On the same day he filed a claim for a refund of $135…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Butchers' Benevolent Ass'n v. Crescent City Live-Stock Landing & Slaughter-House Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1873
  2. Levering & Garrigues Co. v. MorrinSupreme Court of the United States · 1933
  3. United States v. HarrisSupreme Court of the United States · 1883
  4. Marcus Brown Holding Co. v. FeldmanSupreme Court of the United States · 1921
  5. Hodges v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1906

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by46 opinions

  1. Cupp v. CommissionerUnited States Tax Court · 1975
  2. United States v. Arthur J. PorthCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1970
  3. United States v. William S. Lawson, Jr.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1982
  4. Arthur J. Porth v. The Hon. George Templar and the United States of America, United States of America v. Arthur J. PorthCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1971
  5. John W. Crowe v. Commissioner of Internal RevenueCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1968

41 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API