Legal Opinion

In re the Claim of Raymus

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided June 14, 1984PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT

Yesawich, Jr., J.

Claimant gave up his job as night bartender at the Rome Elks Club because he was dissatisfied with the manner in which he was supervised, the security of his position and the method used to calculate his wages. He normally worked a 48-hour week (occasionally putting in an additional hour or two) for which he was paid $180, arrived at as follows: $3.75 per hour for all hours worked, including overtime (hours in excess of 40). The board determined that claimant had good cause to voluntarily leave his employment solely because of the way in which his wages…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Trump-Equitable Fifth Avenue Co. v. GliedmanNew York Court of Appeals · 1982

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Seenaraine v. Securitas Security Services USA, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2007
  2. Thomas v. Review Board of the Department of Employment & Training ServicesIndiana Court of Appeals · 1989
  3. Tilles v. WilliamsAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1986
  4. Thomas v. REVIEW BD., DEPT. OF EMP. & TRAINING SERV.Indiana Court of Appeals · 1989
  5. Mitchell v. Crookston Welding MacHine Co.Court of Appeals of Minnesota · 1992

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API