Legal Opinion

Tilles v. Williams

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided September 8, 1986PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT

Eiber, J.

The issue presented for our consideration on this appeal is whether substantial evidence supported a determination that various ponds situated on property owned by the petitioners constituted freshwater wetlands of "unusual local importance” pursuant to ECL 24-0301 (1). We answer this question in the negative and, therefore, reverse the judgment of Special Term which dismissed the proceeding commenced by petitioners, annul the determination under review, and direct the respondents to remove the petitioners’ property from the final freshwater wetlands map…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Trump-Equitable Fifth Avenue Co. v. GliedmanNew York Court of Appeals · 1982
  2. MATTER OF FANELLI v. New York City Conciliation & Appeals Bd.New York Court of Appeals · 1983
  3. Fanelli v. New York City Conciliation & Appeals BoardAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1982
  4. Consolidated Edison Co. v. Public Service CommissionNew York Court of Appeals · 1984
  5. Circus Disco Ltd. v. New York State Liquor AuthorityNew York Court of Appeals · 1980

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Kaufman v. Incorporated Village of Kings PointAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2008
  2. Mercy Hospital v. Board of Zoning AppealsAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1987
  3. Jorling v. Freshwater Wetlands Appeals BoardNew York Supreme Court · 1990
  4. Foxwood Associates v. Deparment of Environmental ConservationAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1986

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API