John E. Hamilton v. Commonwealth of Virginia
Court of Appeals of Virginia
1Opinion of the Court
ALSTON, Judge.
John E. Hamilton (“defendant”) appeals the trial court’s denial of his motion for a new sentencing. On appeal, defendant contends that the trial court did not properly follow the procedures in Code § 9.1-902(H) and, accordingly, his case should be remanded for compliance with Code § 9.1-902(H). 1 Because we find that the trial court substantially complied with Code § 9.1-902(H), we affirm the trial court’s denial of defendant’s motion for a new sentencing.
BACKGROUND
On appeal from the trial court’s denial of defendant’s motion for a new sentencing, this Court views the evidence…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Boynton v. KilgoreSupreme Court of Virginia · 2006
- DePriest v. CommonwealthCourt of Appeals of Virginia · 1987
- Glenn v. Com.Supreme Court of Virginia · 2008
- Jamborsky v. BaskinsSupreme Court of Virginia · 1994
- Commonwealth v. RaffertySupreme Court of Virginia · 1991
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Antwain Maurice Jones v. Commonwealth of VirginiaCourt of Appeals of Virginia · 2015
- Jacob Lynn Patterson v. Commonwealth of VirginiaCourt of Appeals of Virginia · 2013
- Jones v. CommonwealthCourt of Appeals of Virginia · 2018
- Travis Alexander Bland Henderson, s/k/a Travis Alexander Bland-Henderson v. Commonwealth of VirginiaCourt of Appeals of Virginia · 2023