Legal Opinion

John E. Hamilton v. Commonwealth of Virginia

Court of Appeals of Virginia

Decided March 19, 2013No. 1922114PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ALSTON, Judge.

John E. Hamilton (“defendant”) appeals the trial court’s denial of his motion for a new sentencing. On appeal, defendant contends that the trial court did not properly follow the procedures in Code § 9.1-902(H) and, accordingly, his case should be remanded for compliance with Code § 9.1-902(H). 1 Because we find that the trial court substantially complied with Code § 9.1-902(H), we affirm the trial court’s denial of defendant’s motion for a new sentencing.

BACKGROUND

On appeal from the trial court’s denial of defendant’s motion for a new sentencing, this Court views the evidence…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Boynton v. KilgoreSupreme Court of Virginia · 2006
  2. DePriest v. CommonwealthCourt of Appeals of Virginia · 1987
  3. Glenn v. Com.Supreme Court of Virginia · 2008
  4. Jamborsky v. BaskinsSupreme Court of Virginia · 1994
  5. Commonwealth v. RaffertySupreme Court of Virginia · 1991

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Antwain Maurice Jones v. Commonwealth of VirginiaCourt of Appeals of Virginia · 2015
  2. Jacob Lynn Patterson v. Commonwealth of VirginiaCourt of Appeals of Virginia · 2013
  3. Jones v. CommonwealthCourt of Appeals of Virginia · 2018
  4. Travis Alexander Bland Henderson, s/k/a Travis Alexander Bland-Henderson v. Commonwealth of VirginiaCourt of Appeals of Virginia · 2023

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API