Legal Opinion
Ageloff v. Noranda, Inc.
District Court, D. Rhode Island
Decided September 4, 1996No. C.A. 95-0325LPublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER
LAGUEUX, Chief Judge.
This matter is before the Court on the appeal of defendants, Noranda, Inc. and No-randa Finance, Inc. (“Noranda”), from Magistrate Judge Timothy M. Boudewyns’ Order dated November 14, 1995 denying Noranda’s motion to admit out-of-state counsel pro hac vice. At a hearing held on October 30, 1995, the magistrate judge held that a prior attorney-client relationship had been established among plaintiffs Lester Ageloff, Herbert Stem and Robert Snyder (collectively “plaintiffs” or “Executives”), and proposed defense counsel, David Greer and John Haviland, as…
2Cases cited21 opinions
- Eisenberg v. GagnonCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1985
- The Government of India and the Food Corporation of India v. Cook Industries, Inc. And Cook and CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1978
- United States v. Robert McPartlinCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1979
- Warren B. Sheinkopf v. John K.P. Stone Iii, Etc.Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1991
- Charles Glueck v. Jonathan Logan, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1981
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Essex Chemical Corp. v. Hartford Accident & Indemnity Co.District Court, D. New Jersey · 1998
- United States v. EdwardsDistrict Court, M.D. Louisiana · 1999
- Essex Chemical Corp. v. Hartford Accident & Indemnity Co.District Court, D. New Jersey · 1997