Legal Opinion

Corbett v. Clute

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided March 21, 1905PublishedCited by 11 opinions

ActioN by M. J. Corbett against Nancy Clute and others, heard by Judge Q. S. Ferguson and a jury, at the February Term, 1904, of the Superior Court of Sampson County. This was an action to foreclose a mortgage. From a judgment for the defendants, the plaintiff appealed.

1Opinion of the CourtHoke, J.

Tbe plaintiff declared on a note for $275 dne January 1, 1900, and a mortgage to secure tbe same on tbe land described in tbe complaint. Tbe defendant admitted tbat sbe executed both tbe note and tbe mortgage, and by way of defense alleged tbat sbe was never indebted, bexself, to tbe plaintiff in any sum, and tbat ber signature to tbis instrument was procured by tbe plaintiff’s agent, and at tbe time sbe signed tbe same tbe said agent said to ber in .substance that Theodore Clute, tbe son of tbe defendant, was indebted to tbe plaintiff in tbe sum of $275 and bad obtained said amount in goods,…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Blythe v. . LovinggoodSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1841
  2. Black v. . BayleesSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1882
  3. Harris v. . DelamarSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1844
  4. Vanover v. . ThompsonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1857

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Beeson v. . SmithSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1908
  2. Burton v. BelvinSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1906
  3. Nixon v. NixonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1963
  4. Aycock v. . GillSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1922
  5. Burton v. . BelvinSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1906

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API